Stock Analysis · Bulls vs Bears

FTAI Aviation Ltd. FTAI

🐂 Bulls vs Bears 🐻Report #312 Oct 2026
★ Willem owns this stock · 2.8% of the portfolio
50
elevated risk▼ −6 vs last
🐂 8vs11 🐻
Bears lead
25%
▲ Chance of the biggest tailwind the forecasts miss
35%
▼ Chance of the biggest headwind the forecasts miss
The verdict

The engine business is still winning: GE's own call transcript shows CFM56 shop demand running about 40% above GE's own capacity. FTAI has no debt due before May 2028 and has not issued shares. What is still unproven is cash and control: Over the last twelve months the company had about −$440M of GAAP operating cash flow against ~$478M of net income. About 20% of 2027 guidance runs through J&F, a joint venture that…

The Bulls vs Bears podcast is being made
Two AI hosts debate this report, NotebookLM-style. It appears here automatically within a few hours.

Written by Claude (Anthropic’s AI) from public sources · Willem owns FTAI · AI can make mistakes — numbers in brackets point to the sources · Not financial advice

🐂 Bull arguments 8

  1. 1GE's own data says CFM56 demand outruns shop capacity to 2028Strong
  2. 2Flagship airlines now hand FTAI whole fleetsStrong
  3. 3No debt due before May 2028, with wide covenant headroomStrong
  4. 4Share count flat for a year, with a $500M buybackMedium
  5. 5Power has a paid order in a market short of turbinesMedium
  6. 6Module volume promises are kept and raisedMedium
  7. 7The funds create a captive buyer plus fee incomeMedium
  8. 8The price already discounts a lotWeak

🐻 Bear arguments 11

  1. 1Twelve months of profits, $440M of operating cash outflowHigh
  2. 2Power runs through a Jereh-controlled entity FTAI barely disclosesMedium
  3. 3Half of Q2 revenue came from two customers, one its own fundMedium
  4. 4EO 14421 gives Washington a direct lever over Jereh-built turbinesMedium
  5. 5The 40% margin promise broke within one quarterMedium
  6. 6Guidance on cash, leasing and Power keeps slippingMedium
  7. 7Copycats and costlier feedstock cap pricing powerMedium
  8. 8Unresolved short-seller claims, a pending suit and silent filingsMedium
  9. 9The CFM56 fades from ~2029 and LEAP belongs to the OEMsMedium
  10. 10$404M of book equity under $3.5B of bondsLow
  11. 11Engine aftermarkets collapse hard in an air-travel shockLow

Bull arguments show how well they survive the devil’s advocate (strong / medium / weak); bear arguments show the damage they could do after the counter-argument (high / medium / low).

Bull case

🐂 Bull #1GE's own data says CFM56 demand outruns shop capacity to 2028

  • The point: Airlines cannot retire old 737NGs and A320ceos because new jets are late. Those engines need heavy shop visits, and the market is limited by capacity, not by demand. That suits the company holding the biggest pool of spare modules.
  • Evidence:
    • GE's Q2 call (primary transcript, 2026-07-16):
      • CFM56 shop visits are trending "toward the high end of 2,300–2,400" for 2026.
      • Engines already off-wing plus planned Q3 removals exceed GE's full-year shop-visit guide by more than 40%.
      • The CFO said there are "hardly any used materials in the market, retirements are low", and that heavy workscopes stay stable "until '28, '29" [38].
    • Fleet age: 30% of CFM56s have not had a first shop visit, and two-thirds have not had a second [38].
    • GE's update on 2026-09-22: shop visits "probably closer to 2,400" in both 2026 and 2027, with removals expected up more than 10% in H1 2027 [40].
    • GE's claim: CFM56 retirements "have not exceeded 3% even during major economic downturns" [39].
    • StandardAero (Q2 call, 2026-08-13): CFM56 demand is "strong" and pricing reflects "a capacity-constrained market" [41].
  • Why it matters: Each extra year of flat-to-rising shop visits is another year in which FTAI's 1,700-module 2027 target has buyers. In a capacity-limited market, the module pool is the scarce asset.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • GE also flagged that 2027 retirements may rise to 3–4% [39].
    • About 1,200 CFM56 aircraft are parked or stored, and July CFM56 cycles were down 6% year on year [40]. Fewer hours flown means fewer shop visits.
    • Scarcity of used material also raises FTAI's own input costs (Bear #7).
  • Verdict: Strong This run upgraded the evidence from a summary to GE's own transcript, and GE's 09-22 update pushed the ~2,400 level into 2027.

🐂 Bull #2Flagship airlines now hand FTAI whole fleets

  • The point: Module exchange is moving from small operators to top-tier carriers. Fleet-wide programmes lock in years of volume and of feedstock, because FTAI buys back the removed engines.
  • Evidence:
    • United extended its V2500 programme to CFM56-7B engines on 2026-10-08. Volumes and terms were not disclosed [26].
    • Management says share rose from 12% to 14%, with a 25% target and 3,000 modules a year of capacity [17,62].
    • Q2 module output was 296 (+61%), and H1 output was 566 [5,62].
    • Aerospace Products revenue was $875.0M in Q2, up 78% [5].
  • Why it matters: A repeat, wider win at a top-3 US airline shows the product works at scale. A bigger pool means faster swaps, which wins more programmes.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • The 14% share is a company claim that nobody has verified.
    • The United deal has no disclosed value.
    • Management's own Q1 explanation for lower margins was "an increased mix of deals with large airline customers" [20]. The flagship wins are part of why margins fell (Bear #5).
  • Verdict: Strong on position, Medium on profit per unit.

🐂 Bull #3No debt due before May 2028, with wide covenant headroom

  • The point: Liquidity is not the risk even with negative operating cash flow. Nothing is due for 19 months and covenants are loose.
  • Evidence:
    • Debt is five bond tranches totalling $3,496M. The first is $1.0B at 5.50% due 2028-05-01, then $500M at 7.875% (2030), $700M at 7.0% (2031), $800M at 7.0% (2032) and $500M at 5.875% (2033) [3].
    • The $2.025B revolver matures 2031-04-24 and is undrawn. Its covenants are interest coverage of at least 3.0x and debt/EBITDA of at most 4.0x [3,9].
    • Our arithmetic: gross debt / LTM adjusted EBITDA ($1,191.6M) ≈ 2.9x, and net ≈ 2.65x. LTM adjusted EBITDA / interest (~$247M) ≈ 4.8x. Company definition: 2.7x [3,5,17].
    • Moody's upgraded FTAI to Ba1 on 2026-05-19 [29].
    • The $105M of 8.25% Series C preferred was redeemed in June 2026. Only $65M of Series D preferred is left [3].
  • Why it matters: FTAI can carry the Power build and its fund co-investments for two years without being forced into a share issue.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • Adjusted EBITDA includes asset-sale gains, insurance recoveries ($49.5M in H1) and ~$48M of FTAI's share of unconsolidated entities' EBITDA [3]. Covenant headroom on cleaner EBITDA is smaller.
    • The 10-Q says FTAI is "evaluating… certain additional debt and equity financings, which could occur within the next 12 months" [3].
    • The 2028 refinancing will be at ~7%, against 5.5% today.
  • Verdict: Strong This is new in this report; dive #2 rated balance-sheet de-risking Medium without the covenant and maturity detail.

🐂 Bull #4Share count flat for a year, with a $500M buyback

  • The point: Unlike most growth stories in this portfolio, owners have not been diluted.
  • Evidence:
    • Shares on the cover page went from 102.57M (2025-07-29) to 102.71M (2026-07-29), +0.13%. Weighted diluted shares rose 103.15M → 104.04M (+0.9%) [3,14].
    • There are no convertibles and no at-the-market share programme [1,3].
    • A $500M buyback runs to 2029-09-30 (announced 2026-09-15). The amount bought so far is not found [28].
  • Why it matters: Per-share value tracks business value. The buyback is about 2.9% of the ~$17.5B market cap.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • An automatic shelf registration (S-3ASR) has been on file since 2026-05-01, and the 10-Q flags possible equity financing [3,10].
    • No 8-K was filed for the buyback, and nothing had been repurchased by the Q2 10-Q.
    • Buying back stock with negative GAAP operating cash flow means funding it from asset sales or debt.
  • Verdict: Medium

🐂 Bull #5Power has a paid order in a market short of turbines

  • The point: Data centres need firm power faster than heavy-turbine makers can deliver. A turbine built on a CFM56 core gives FTAI's engines a second use.
  • Evidence:
    • The order: a $1.465B master-agreement order, with milestone payments starting with an advance at signing and deliveries through November 2027 [22]. Jereh says it has received the first prepayment [24].
    • Repeat buyer: Jereh says its cumulative business with this customer is $1.72B, and that this is its seventh data-centre turbine contract since November 2025 [25].
    • Market tightness:
      • GE Vernova's gas backlog plus slot reservations rose from 100 GW to 116 GW in Q2 2026. It booked 61 aeroderivative units in Q2 and is pushing its price per kW up [44].
      • New aeroderivative orders now face 12–18 month lead times [46].
    • Management claim: Power margins "as good or better than" Aerospace [19].
  • Why it matters: The $450M Power guide is ~20% of the $2.3B 2027 segment EBITDA guide [5]. A working Mod-1 also sets a price floor under FTAI's ~1,000 CFM56s once flying demand fades.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • No commercial unit has shipped. The order allows a downward price adjustment of up to 10% for underperformance [22].
    • J&F, not FTAI, is the contract party, and Jereh controls J&F (Bear #2).
    • Competitors are shipping: ProEnergy's PE6000s (21 sold, >1 GW), Boom Superpower (29 units for Crusoe), and Jereh's own GenSystems unit with over $1.1B of US data-centre orders [25,45].
  • Verdict: Medium Demand is not in doubt. How much of the value reaches FTAI is.

🐂 Bull #6Module volume promises are kept and raised

  • The point: On units, management under-promises.
  • Evidence:
    • 757 modules in 2025 against a 750 target.
    • The 2026 target went 1,000 → 1,050 → 1,200.
    • H1 2026 output of 566 is on pace [17,19,62].
    • 2025 segment EBITDA landed at ~$1.28B against a $1.25–1.30B guide [5,7,21].
  • Why it matters: It makes the 1,700-module 2027 target, the base of the $1.4B Aerospace guide, believable.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate: Margin, cash-flow, Leasing and Power-timing promises all slipped in the same window (Bear #5, Bear #6). Volume is the easiest metric to hit if you are willing to give up price.
  • Verdict: Medium

🐂 Bull #7The funds create a captive buyer plus fee income

  • The point: Selling leased jets into outside-funded vehicles frees capital. FTAI earns servicing fees and carried interest, and gets an exclusive module customer for the life of each fund.
  • Evidence:
    • The 2025 Partnership ($2.0B of equity, ~300 aircraft) is fully invested. FTAI holds 19% [3,62].
    • The fund paid FTAI $404.0M of MRE contract revenue and $12.8M of servicing fees in H1 2026 [3].
    • Its first asset-backed bond ($612M) funded a July distribution [17].
    • The 2026 fund targets $6B with a 15% FTAI commitment, bridged by a capital-call facility [17].
  • Why it matters: Locked-in demand of ~20% of Aerospace revenue, according to the CFO [17], plus a fee stream that needs little capital.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • It is circular. The fund is FTAI's second-biggest customer (Bear #3).
    • Leasing EBITDA fell from $153.0M in Q1 to $88.2M in Q2 [3].
    • 2026 Leasing guidance was cut from $575M to $475M [5].
    • FTAI must keep putting in 15% of new equity.
  • Verdict: Medium

🐂 Bull #8The price already discounts a lot

  • The point: At ~$170, the stock trades at a modest multiple of what management says 2027 looks like.
  • Evidence:
    • Our arithmetic: 102.7M shares × $169.96 ≈ $17.5B market cap. Add $3.5B of debt and subtract $0.34B of cash for an EV of ≈ $20.6B, or ≈ 9.0x the $2.3B 2027 segment EBITDA guide [3,5].
    • Price / FY2027 consensus EPS ($13.50) ≈ 12.6x [57].
    • Short interest fell from 7.0M shares (2026-07-31) to 5.7M (2026-09-30), 4.3 days to cover (FINRA via aggregator) [58].
    • The sell-side remains all Buy or Overweight. Mean targets are $317 (MarketBeat, 10 ratings incl. 2 quant Holds) or $356 (S&P data) [56,57].
  • Why it matters: If 2027 is close to the guide, the bar for upside is not high.
  • 😈 Devil's advocate:
    • FY2026 P/E on consensus ($5.86) is ~29x [57].
    • The 12.6x only works if EPS rises ~130% in a year, and that jump includes $450M of Power EBITDA from a product that has never shipped.
    • Targets were cut by RBC, BTIG, Barclays and Deutsche since July [56].
  • Verdict: Weak to Medium. It rests on 2027 delivering, which is the debate itself.

Bear case

🐻 Bear #1Twelve months of profits, $440M of operating cash outflow

  • The point: Reported profit does not become operating cash. The company's "adjusted free cash flow" counts engine and aircraft sale proceeds that its own cash-flow statement places in investing.
  • Evidence:
    • Quarterly GAAP operating cash flow: +$4.6M (Q3-25), −$179.1M (Q4-25), −$160.1M (Q1-26), −$105.2M (Q2-26). LTM ≈ −$440M against net income of ≈ $478M [3,4,14].
    • The company's adjusted FCF for the same quarters: $268M, $86M, $158M, $97M [19,20,21].
    • Where the gap sits:
      • The 10-Q books $356.7M of inventory purchases and $511.2M of manufacturing outflows in operating cash flow.
      • $538.4M of proceeds from selling rebuilt engines sits in investing.
      • H1 asset-sale proceeds totalled $793.0M ($617.3M external + $175.7M to the 2025 Partnership) [3].
    • Reconstruction (our arithmetic): −$265.3M operating + $793.0M sales − $187.1M equipment and PP&E − $94.6M dividends ≈ +$246M. That is close to the company's $255M [3,17].
    • The 10-Q notes that operating cash flow "has been less than" distributions to shareholders ($200.1M in H1, including the preferred redemption) [3].
    • Margins: gross margin slid 45.6% → 33.3% over four quarters, and GAAP FCF margin ran −0.3%, −28.6%, −20.1% and −12.9% [3].
  • Why it matters:
    • In a real exchange business the engine pool is inventory, so this presentation is arguable. But it means "free cash flow" depends on how quickly FTAI turns engines and jets into sales, not on recurring operations.
    • The pool must grow every year to hit volume targets. So GAAP operating cash flow may stay negative for as long as the business is growing.
    • This is exactly the area the Muddy Waters report attacked [63].
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • Inventory is the product. Engines bought, rebuilt and sold are the business, and the $793M did come in as cash.
    • Management says Power will have "a much higher cash conversion cycle" because customers prepay [17].
    • Total debt stayed flat at $3.5B over the year while dividends rose four times [3].
  • Severity: High The counter explains where the cash comes from but not when operations will fund themselves. The quarterly table now shows the gap persisting for a full year.

🐻 Bear #2Power runs through a Jereh-controlled entity FTAI barely discloses

  • The point: About a fifth of 2027 guidance depends on a joint venture that its Chinese partner consolidates. FTAI gives investors almost nothing to analyse.
  • Evidence:
    • Jereh's announcement (2026-07-24) and its investor-relations record (2026-09-05) both call J&F Power Systems LLC a "控股子公司" (controlled subsidiary). No percentage is given [23,24]. Jereh's H1 report says the same [66].
    • What FTAI's filings say:
      • The FY2025 10-K has zero mentions of "FTAI Power", "Jereh" or "J&F".
      • The Q1 and Q2 10-Qs each carry one sentence on FTAI Power.
      • No 8-K was filed for the $1.465B order.
      • Power is not a segment: its costs sit in "Corporate and Other", whose adjusted EBITDA went from −$28.9M to −$79.8M in H1.
      • The only unexplained new investment line is "Other: various", $4.1M [1,2,3,14].
    • No risk factor in the 10-K or Q2 10-Q mentions Power, Jereh, China-made turbines or performance guarantees [3].
    • Who bears the up-to-10% performance adjustment: not found. Jereh says settlement "floats up or down" with test results [23].
    • Management says FTAI books turbine sales to J&F as revenue plus an equity share of J&F's profit, and calls unit economics commercially sensitive [17].
  • Why it matters: Interpretation: FTAI's Power profit depends on a transfer price into an entity it does not control, set on terms investors cannot see. Jereh, as controller, keeps the residual margin on the final sale.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • FTAI controls the scarce input (CFM56 cores) and the engineering.
    • Power becomes a reported segment from 2027, and the 2026-12-10 Investor Meeting covers Power [17,27].
    • A customer advance has been paid [24].
  • Severity: Medium High. Re-tested and confirmed by two more Jereh-side sources this run. FTAI's silence in SEC filings is now documented, not inferred.

🐻 Bear #3Half of Q2 revenue came from two customers, one its own fund

  • The point: Revenue is concentrated and lumpy. One of the two biggest buyers is a vehicle FTAI co-owns and services.
  • Evidence:
    • Customer shares of revenue:
      • Q2-26: two Aerospace customers at 30% and 20%.
      • Q1-26: 28%, 17% and 10%.
      • H1-26: 23%, 21% and 13%.
      • FY2025: 13% and 10% [1,2,3].
    • Two customers make up 17% and 14% of receivables at 2026-06-30 [3].
    • Our arithmetic: the 2025 Partnership's MRE revenue plus servicing fees = 23.4% of H1 revenue and 19.9% of Q2 revenue. That makes it the "20%" customer in Q2, not the 30% one [3].
    • So an unnamed third party bought ≈ $286M in Q2, about 41% of Aerospace Products revenue excluding the fund. That is roughly 3x what it bought in Q1.
    • Ireland was 23% of H1 revenue by customer location, consistent with the Partnership's Irish buyer vehicle [3].
  • Why it matters:
    • One large buyer pausing would show in a single quarter.
    • Sales to the fund are priced by FTAI, which co-owns and services the fund and earns carry from it.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • The fund has $2.0B of outside equity and "customary market-based" prices, and FTAI eliminates its share of the profit [3].
    • Big airline programmes like United are multi-year.
  • Severity: Medium High. New this run: the 30% customer is a third party, so concentration is wider than just the related fund.

🐻 Bear #4EO 14421 gives Washington a direct lever over Jereh-built turbines

  • The point: A new US order lets the Department of Energy block, condition or force removal of generation turbines tied to China.
  • Evidence:
    • What EO 14421 covers (Federal Register 2026-08-31):
      • It covers "foreign-produced" bulk-power system equipment, meaning "not manufactured, produced, or assembled in the United States".
      • "Generation turbines" are named.
      • Covered entities include China and anyone it owns or controls.
      • Installed equipment can be ordered isolated or removed [32].
    • It is not an automatic ban; DOE must make findings first [34].
    • DOE's request for information (comments due 2026-10-09) asks in question A-5 how to treat final assembly, white-labelling and refurbishment. That is exactly the J&F set-up: US-origin cores, Chinese packaging, a US factory [33].
    • Rules are due "as needed" around 2026-12-24 [32,34].
    • Jereh's view: the direct impact is "limited" because its units are "mainly used for off-grid power in data centers" and it has a localized US factory [24].
    • Jereh's record: on the Entity List from 2016, with OFAC and BIS settlements in 2018. There is no Federal Register action on it since 2020, and it is not on the 2026 Pentagon 1260H list [35,36,37].
    • Tariffs: a Section 301 layer of 12.5% on Chinese goods has applied since 2026-07-24, on top of existing duties. Whether it applies to gensets was not confirmed [53].
  • Why it matters: A DOE condition, or a customer's own "no China content" rule, would delay or restructure the $450M 2027 Power plan.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • The bulk-power system is defined by interconnection at 69 kV and above. Behind-the-meter, islanded data-centre units may fall outside it, and the order is silent on that [32].
    • US assembly may take units out of "foreign-produced".
    • The turbine core is FTAI's.
  • Severity: Medium The scope is unresolved, and the key date is ~2026-12-24.

🐻 Bear #5The 40% margin promise broke within one quarter

  • The point: Growth is being bought with margin, and management's margin guidance proved unreliable.
  • Evidence:
    • The promises:
      • Q3-25 call: Aerospace margins "to grow to 40% plus next year" [21].
      • Q4-25 call (2026-02-26): "everything we wanted to have in place to achieve that 40% margin is in place" [19].
    • What happened: Aerospace margin went 34.8% (Q3-25) → 34.6% → 29.9% → 28.5% (Q2-26) [3,5].
    • The new line: "30% margins, it's the margin that we're going to hold" for one to two years [17].
    • Management's explanation is mix: ~6,000-cycle engines earn ~40% and ~10,000-cycle engines ~25% [17].
  • Why it matters:
    • The 2027 $1.4B Aerospace guide at ~30% implies ~$4.7B of segment revenue (our arithmetic). Every point of margin is ≈ $47M of EBITDA.
    • The margin levers that were supposed to lift it (PMA blades, the CFM materials deal, in-house repair) have not shown up.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • Dollar EBITDA still grew 51% in Q2 [5].
    • Heavier, longer-life restorations are worth more per engine.
    • Management now explicitly targets share rather than margin percentage.
  • Severity: Medium

🐻 Bear #6Guidance on cash, leasing and Power keeps slipping

  • The point: Apart from module volumes, most guided numbers have moved down.
  • Evidence:
    • 2026 free cash flow guide: $1.0B (Q3-25) → $915M (Q4-25) → $878M (Q2-26) [17,19,21].
    • 2025 free cash flow: $724M against a "revised goal of $750M" [19].
    • 2026 Leasing EBITDA: $575M → $475M [5].
    • Power: "first production units Q4 2026" became "prudent to expect Power deliveries in 2027" [17,19].
    • The "~$1.2B before growth initiatives" FCF figure has no published bridge; the IR presentation was not reachable and it is not on EDGAR [17].
  • Why it matters: The 2027 $2.3B guide stacks three things that have each slipped once: Aerospace margin, Leasing/fund EBITDA and Power timing.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • The cuts reflect deliberate choices: modules moved from leasing to Aerospace, Mod-1 acceleration of $150M, and +$30M of Power R&D [17].
    • Volume guidance has been raised every time.
  • Severity: Medium

🐻 Bear #7Copycats and costlier feedstock cap pricing power

  • The point: FTAI's edge is scale and a head start, not a licence. Rivals are building module capability, and the old engines FTAI must buy as raw material keep getting dearer.
  • Evidence:
    • Willis Lease completed its first CFM56-7B core restoration (February 2026, "Willis Module Shop", developed with CFM) [42].
    • StandardAero's CFM56 Dallas-Fort Worth centre turned profitable in Q2 2026 [41].
    • IBA's H2 2026 values: V2500-A5 market values −7% and lease rates −6%, which IBA ties to rising feedstock costs. CFM56-5B/-7B values "levelled off" after ~18 months of increases (trade summary of IBA data) [43].
    • Power needs about one CFM56 core per unit, so 100 cores for 100 units, from the same scarce pool.
  • Why it matters: If feedstock costs rise while module prices plateau, margins compress further than the 30% guide.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • FTAI owns ~1,000 CFM56s, and exchange customers hand over their removed engines.
    • GE's own shops are 40% oversubscribed [38]. There is room for several module suppliers.
  • Severity: Medium

🐻 Bear #8Unresolved short-seller claims, a pending suit and silent filings

  • The point: The 2025 accounting attack was never tested by a court or regulator, and FTAI discloses very little about it.
  • Evidence:
    • The lawsuit: in Shannahan v. FTAI (S.D.N.Y. 1:25-cv-00541), the motion to dismiss has been fully briefed since February 2026. The last docket entry found is dated 2026-06-10, and there is no ruling. The class period is 2024-07-23 to 2025-01-15 [30,31].
    • SEC comment letters: the defendants' exhibits include SEC comment letters dated 2024-11-27 and 2025-01-03, on accounting topics including ASC 360, 330, 606 and 230 (assets, inventory, revenue, cash-flow classification) [30]. Neither the 10-K nor the 10-Qs mention the suit or the letters [1,3].
    • Auditor change: EY (FTAI's auditor since 2016) was dismissed on 2025-06-17, five months after the Muddy Waters report, and KPMG took over. The 8-K says there were no disagreements [8].
    • Iran allegation: Muddy Waters' Iran/Sorena claim (2025-03-03) has no FTAI response in its filings [64]. OFAC designated a "Sorena Hushmand Samaneh" company on 2026-05-29. We could not confirm it is the same entity [68].
    • Insiders: director Tuchman sold ~$61.5M at ~$241 in May 2026, outside a pre-set (10b5-1) plan. The only open-market buy is Moreno's ~$0.5M at $201.27 on 2026-07-31. No one bought at $160–190 [15,16].
  • Why it matters: The cash-flow classification questions in Bear #1 are the same topics the SEC letters covered. A denied motion to dismiss would open discovery.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • The audit committee's forensic review found the claims "without merit" [1].
    • The FY2025 internal-control opinion is unqualified, there is no restatement, and KPMG was ratified with 94.2M votes for against 0.1M against [1,11].
  • Severity: Medium Low. Upgraded slightly from dive #2 because of the SEC comment letters and the auditor-change timing, both new this run.

🐻 Bear #9The CFM56 fades from ~2029 and LEAP belongs to the OEMs

  • The point: The core engine family declines within the stock's investment horizon. Its successor's aftermarket is guarded by GE and Safran.
  • Evidence:
    • GE's CFO puts stable CFM56 workscopes "until '28, '29" [38].
    • FTAI plans to enter LEAP maintenance only in 2028–29, with no product yet [17,62].
    • Management sizes LEAP at 2–3x the CFM56 market [62].
  • Why it matters: Without LEAP or Power at scale, the franchise is time-limited.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument: The CFM56 fleet is young in maintenance terms (two-thirds have had no second shop visit), and Power gives retired engines a second market [38].
  • Severity: Medium Slow-moving and visible years ahead.

🐻 Bear #10$404M of book equity under $3.5B of bonds

  • The point: There is little accounting cushion under the bonds.
  • Evidence:
    • Total assets $4,489M, liabilities $4,085M, equity $404.0M [3].
    • H1 distributions of $200.1M exceeded operating cash flow [3].
    • The 10-Q flags possible new financing [3].
  • Why it matters: A Power write-down or inventory impairment would hit a thin equity base, and it limits flexibility if 2027 slips.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • Book equity is low partly because of years of dividends and buybacks.
    • Interest coverage is 4.8x, there are no maturities before 2028, and the credit rating is rising [3,29].
  • Severity: Low Medium.

🐻 Bear #11Engine aftermarkets collapse hard in an air-travel shock

  • The point: The 2020 record shows how fast this business can shrink, and airlines are under fuel stress now.
  • Evidence:
    • 2020:
      • Engine shop visits fell "up to 70%" year on year, according to IBA [50].
      • Pratt & Whitney saw V2500 demand fall ~60% in Q2 2020 [50].
      • AerSale's engine revenue fell 63.4% in FY2020 [51].
      • MTU's MRO EBIT fell 48% [52].
    • Now:
      • IATA cut its 2026 industry margin to 2.0% with jet fuel at $152/bbl [47].
      • August 2026 passenger demand was −0.8% (North America −2.2%) [48].
      • A secondary report puts spot jet fuel at $194.90/bbl in the week to 2026-09-18 [49].
  • Why it matters: Exchange is a discretionary alternative to a shop visit. In a shock, airlines park their oldest jets, which are exactly FTAI's engine types.
  • 🛡️ Counter-argument:
    • StandardAero sees no demand cut from fuel prices and says airlines cut maintenance last [41].
    • GE notes that retirements have never exceeded 3% even in downturns [39].
  • Severity: Low Medium.

Tailwinds NOT in the forecasts

Base for sizing: FY2027 consensus revenue $6.60B, EPS $13.50 (S&P data via stockanalysis, 2026-09-29) [57]. ~104M diluted shares [3]. EBITDA-to-EPS conversion assumes ~10% tax and no extra interest (estimate). FY2028 consensus: not found.

  • Power ships close to 100 units in 2027 — 25% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: not quantifiable. FTAI's transfer price per turbine into J&F is undisclosed.

    • Impact on EPS: +$2.60 per share / +19% vs FY2027 consensus

    • How we got the number (estimate): $750M top of range − $450M guide = +$300M EBITDA × 0.9 ÷ 104M shares ≈ +$2.60

    • Expected value: 0.25 × $2.60 ≈ +$0.65

    • What it is: Power EBITDA reaches the top of management's $450–750M range [17].

    • Why it's not priced in: Guidance "does not assume 100 units", and no sell-side Power model was found [17,57].

    • Trigger to watch: first commercial Mod-1 delivery and a 2027 unit schedule on 2026-10-29 or 2026-12-10.

    • Why this probability: The order and cash advance exist, but no unit has shipped, Jereh plans deliveries "in batches during 2027", and first-of-a-kind hardware rarely ramps on plan. Trimmed from 28%.

  • A second large Power order, adding ~25 units in 2028 — 35% chance within 24 months

    • Impact on revenue: not quantifiable (transfer price undisclosed).

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ +$1.62 per share in FY2028 / +12% measured against the FY2027 consensus base (FY2028 consensus not found)

    • How we got the number (estimate): 25 units × $7.5M EBITDA per unit (management's earlier claim, unverified) × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ +$1.62

    • Expected value: 0.35 × $1.62 ≈ +$0.57

    • What it is: A follow-on order under the five-year master agreement, or a new customer [22].

    • Why it's not priced in: The 2027 guide rests on one order. Only one blogger (Kairos) models 2028 Power ($650M) [59].

    • Trigger to watch: a Jereh exchange announcement (it must disclose large orders) or an FTAI press release.

    • Why this probability: The same buyer has already placed several orders ($1.72B cumulative) and turbine lead times are 12–18 months, but buyers will want field hours first.

  • Shop visits hold ~2,400 through 2027, lifting module volume ~5% — 40% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: ≈ +$243M / +3.7% vs FY2027 consensus

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ +$0.61 per share / +4.5%

    • How we got the number (estimate): 85 extra modules × ~$2.86M of Aerospace revenue per module (H1 $1,619M ÷ 566) ≈ $243M. $70M EBITDA at ~29% margin × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ +$0.61

    • Expected value: 0.40 × $0.61 ≈ +$0.24

    • What it is: GE's "closer to 2,400" for 2027 and +10% removals in H1 2027 come true, and FTAI sells above its 1,700 target [40].

    • Why it's not priced in: The guide is anchored on 1,700 modules, and GE's planning still allows 3–4% retirements [39].

    • Trigger to watch: GE Aerospace Q3 call (date unconfirmed, ~2026-10-20 to 10-27) and FTAI's 2027 module target.

    • Why this probability: Retirements have undershot every forecast for three years, but the 1,700 target already assumes strong demand.

  • Aerospace margin recovers to ~33% in 2027 — 20% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: none (a margin effect).

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ +$1.21 per share / +9%

    • How we got the number (estimate): +3 points × ~$4.67B implied Aerospace revenue ($1.4B ÷ 30%) ≈ +$140M × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ +$1.21

    • Expected value: 0.20 × $1.21 ≈ +$0.24

    • What it is: PMA blades, the CFM materials deal and in-house piece-part repair finally show up in margin.

    • Why it's not priced in: Management says ~30% for one to two years [17].

    • Trigger to watch: the Q3 Aerospace margin and the 2026-12-10 2027 framework.

    • Why this probability: Management is deliberately trading margin for share, so a recovery would go against its own plan.

  • The Investor Meeting discloses J&F economics — 35% chance by 2026-12-10

    • Impact on revenue / EPS: not quantifiable. It changes how much the market trusts the Power numbers, not the earnings themselves.

    • What it is: FTAI's stake, transfer pricing and warranty split, published for the first time [27].

    • Why it's not priced in: The market discounts Power partly because the terms are hidden.

    • Trigger to watch: the Q3 10-Q notes, then 2026-12-10.

    • Why this probability: Power becomes a segment in 2027, which forces some disclosure, but management has so far called the terms commercially sensitive.

  • Earlier LEAP entry via CFM — 10% chance within 36 months

    • Impact on revenue / EPS: not quantifiable. There is no product or pricing to size.

    • What it is: OEM parts or licence access for LEAP modules before 2028.

    • Why it's not priced in: Management itself says 2028–29.

    • Trigger to watch: an extension of the January 2026 CFM materials agreement.

    • Why this probability: GE is actively defending LEAP aftermarket profitability.

Headwinds NOT in the forecasts

  • Power EBITDA lands below ~$250M in 2027 — 35% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: not quantifiable (transfer price undisclosed).

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$2.16 per share / −16% vs FY2027 consensus

    • How we got the number (estimate): $450M guide − $200M = −$250M EBITDA × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ −$2.16

    • Expected value: 0.35 × −$2.16 ≈ −$0.76

    • What it is: Slips in Mod-1 reliability, customer permits, J&F ramp or customer call-offs push deliveries into 2028 [22,55].

    • Why it's not priced in: The $450M sits inside the official $2.3B guide, and consensus FY2027 EPS of $13.50 assumes a ~130% jump [5,57].

    • Trigger to watch: no commercial delivery by Q1 2027, or softer Power language on 2026-10-29.

    • Why this probability: Timing has already slipped once, and there is still no field-proven unit.

  • Aerospace margin stays ≤27% through 2027 — 30% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: none (a margin effect).

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$1.21 per share / −9%

    • How we got the number (estimate): −3 points × ~$4.67B ≈ −$140M × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ −$1.21

    • Expected value: 0.30 × −$1.21 ≈ −$0.36

    • What it is: Heavier workscopes, dearer feedstock and copycat pricing pull margin below the "30% we're going to hold" [17,43].

    • Why it's not priced in: The $1.4B 2027 guide is anchored on ~30%.

    • Trigger to watch: the Q3 2026 Aerospace margin (Q2 was 28.5%).

    • Why this probability: Two quarters are already below 30%, but scarcity still supports pricing.

  • DOE or a customer acts against Jereh-built units, delaying half of 2027 Power — 15% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: not quantifiable.

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$1.95 per share / −14%

    • How we got the number (estimate): half of $450M = −$225M EBITDA × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ −$1.95

    • Expected value: 0.15 × −$1.95 ≈ −$0.29 (partly overlaps the Power-shortfall headwind)

    • What it is: EO 14421 rules cover behind-the-meter units or Chinese-packaged equipment, or a hyperscaler demands a J&F restructuring [32,33].

    • Why it's not priced in: No FTAI filing or analyst coverage found mentions it [3].

    • Trigger to watch: DOE rules (~2026-12-24), the RFI comment docket, and congressional letters.

    • Why this probability: The legal tool exists and RFI question A-5 targets assembly questions, but Jereh's off-grid/US-factory defence is plausible. Trimmed from 18%.

  • Retirements jump to 3–4% in 2027, pressuring module pricing — 25% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: ≈ −$233M / −3.5% vs FY2027 consensus

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$1.04 per share / −7.7%

    • How we got the number (estimate): −5% price on ~$4.67B Aerospace revenue ≈ −$233M. About half falls to EBITDA after volume offset ≈ −$120M × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ −$1.04

    • Expected value: 0.25 × −$1.04 ≈ −$0.26

    • What it is: Faster Airbus/Boeing deliveries free up more used material [39].

    • Why it's not priced in: The guide assumes scarcity continues.

    • Trigger to watch: GE retirement data, Boeing at 52/month, Airbus at 75/month.

    • Why this probability: OEM ramps keep slipping, and GE has 2,400 shop visits for 2027.

  • Fund/Leasing EBITDA misses $450M in 2027 by ~$75M — 30% chance by 2027-12-31

    • Impact on revenue: not quantifiable (mix of fees, equity earnings and gains).

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$0.65 per share / −4.8%

    • How we got the number (estimate): −$75M × 0.9 ÷ 104M ≈ −$0.65

    • Expected value: 0.30 × −$0.65 ≈ −$0.19

    • What it is: The 2026 fund closes well below $6B, or fills slowly, while the owned lease book keeps shrinking.

    • Why it's not priced in: The guide uses $450M.

    • Trigger to watch: the 2026 fund's close size; Leasing EBITDA in Q3.

    • Why this probability: 2026 Leasing guidance was already cut by $100M for the same reason.

  • Equity raise of ~5% of shares — 15% chance within 24 months

    • Impact on revenue: none.

    • Impact on EPS: ≈ −$0.64 per share / −4.8% (dilution)

    • How we got the number (estimate): 5.1M new shares ($875M at $170) ÷ 104M ≈ −4.8% × $13.50 ≈ −$0.64

    • Expected value: 0.15 × −$0.64 ≈ −$0.10

    • What it is: FTAI funds Power working capital or fund co-investment with shares [3,10].

    • Why it's not priced in: A $500M buyback signals the opposite.

    • Trigger to watch: a prospectus supplement under the S-3ASR.

    • Why this probability: It is explicitly flagged in the 10-Q, but the revolver is undrawn and a raise would contradict a buyback announced a month ago.

  • The securities suit survives the motion to dismiss — 25% chance within 12 months

    • Impact on revenue / EPS: not quantifiable. Damages are unspecified, and the class period covers a ~3-month drop.

    • What it is: Discovery opens on the cash-flow classification and module/engine revenue claims [30].

    • Why it's not priced in: It is treated as closed history.

    • Trigger to watch: the S.D.N.Y. docket (Judge Vargas).

    • Why this probability: Most securities suits built on short reports are dismissed, but the SEC comment letters in the record cover the same topics.

Investment Risk Score: 50/100 (elevated)

# Factor Weight Measured value Score Why
1 Liquidity & funding runway 15% Cash $337M + $2.025B undrawn revolver; GAAP op CF −$440M LTM; adjusted FCF +$609M LTM (asset sales); no maturity before 2028-05-01 45 Liquidity is ample and nothing is due for 19 months. But operations do not fund themselves on a GAAP basis, so this is not "FCF-positive with modest debt".
2 Leverage 10% Net debt/LTM adj. EBITDA ≈ 2.65x (company 2.7x); covenant max 4.0x; coverage 4.8x vs 3.0x 55 In the 1.5–3x band, but adjusted EBITDA includes gains, insurance recoveries and unconsolidated share. Book equity is only $404M.
3 Dilution 10% Basic shares +0.13% y/y, diluted +0.9%; no converts or ATM; S-3ASR shelf + 10-Q financing flag; $500M buyback 28 In the 0–3% band, raised for the stated equity-financing option.
4 Profitability 10% Net margin ~15%; GAAP FCF margin −0.3% / −28.6% / −20.1% / −12.9% (last 4 qtrs) 55 Profitable on paper, negative on GAAP cash. Scored "around break-even" rather than loss-making because adjusted FCF is positive.
5 Revenue quality & concentration 10% Q2 top customer 30% (third party), #2 20% (own fund); mostly one-off engine/module sales 60 At the top of the 20–35% band, with a related party and one-off sales.
6 Execution & track record 10% Volumes hit/raised; 40% margin promise missed by ~10 pts; FCF guide cut twice; Leasing cut $100M; Power delivery slipped; auditor change 2025; no material weakness 62 Frequent misses outside volume. No restatement or control weakness, so not 81+.
7 Competitive position & disruption 10% ~14% claimed CFM56/V2500 share; GE shops 40% oversubscribed; Willis/StandardAero copying modules 38 A strong niche built on scale and pool, not a protected position.
8 Cyclicality & macro sensitivity 10% 2020: shop visits −70%, AerSale engine revenue −63%; fuel ~$150–195/bbl; IATA margin 2.0% 55 Cyclical. Aftermarket demand is sticky in mild downturns but collapses in a traffic shock.
9 Regulatory, legal & geopolitical 5% EO 14421 (rules ~12-24); Jereh-controlled JV; securities suit pending; Iran allegation unanswered 62 China exposure through the Power JV puts this in the 61–80 band.
10 Valuation & expectations 10% EV ≈ $20.6B ≈ 9.0x 2027 guided EBITDA; P/E 29x FY26, 12.6x FY27 cons (needs +130% EPS); short interest 5.6%, falling 50 Cheap only if 2027 delivers. The FY27 consensus already includes unproven Power.

Overall: weighted average = 6.75 + 5.5 + 2.8 + 5.5 + 6.0 + 6.2 + 3.8 + 5.5 + 3.1 + 5.0 = 50.15 → 50. Change vs last: −6. This is mainly the method change (old six-area 56 → v3 ten-factor 50), not a change in the facts:

  • The new method scores dilution separately (28), and dilution is low.
  • It also scores competitive position separately (38), which is FTAI's strongest area.
  • This run's new facts pushed both ways. The covenant and maturity detail lowered funding risk. The quarterly GAAP cash table and the third-party 30% customer raised profitability and concentration risk.

Ranking check: FTAI sits level with REAX (50) and just below QXO (53): it has REAX-like leverage without REAX's housing-cycle and agent-attrition pressure, but carries a cash-conversion and China-JV risk that REAX does not, while being far less diluted than QXO (88 on dilution).

Conclusion

  • What you are really betting on:

    • That FTAI's engine pool keeps converting into sales at ~30% margins through ~2028.
    • That the asset-sale-heavy cash flow becomes operating cash once the pool stops growing.
    • That Power delivers real profit to FTAI rather than mostly to Jereh.

  • The 2–3 things that will decide the outcome:

    1. First Mod-1 deliveries in 2027 and the J&F terms. Together they decide whether the $450M Power line is real and how much FTAI keeps.
    2. GAAP operating cash flow. It needs to turn positive in some quarter of 2027, or the "adjusted FCF" story rests entirely on selling assets.
    3. CFM56 shop visits holding ~2,400 in 2027, and the Aerospace margin holding ≥29%.

  • Signposts:

    • Confirm bull:
      • Positive GAAP operating cash flow in Q3 or Q4 2026.
      • First commercial Mod-1 delivery by Q1 2027, with FTAI's J&F stake and transfer pricing disclosed.
      • A second Power order.
      • GE confirming ~2,400 CFM56 shop visits for 2027.
    • Break bull:
      • Power deliveries pushed past mid-2027 or the $450M cut.
      • DOE rules (~2026-12-24) explicitly covering behind-the-meter turbines or Chinese packaging.
      • Aerospace margin below 27%.
      • An equity raise while operating cash flow is still negative.

  • New since the last report:

    • Funding is safer than we thought, cash conversion is worse. Covenant and maturity detail (4.0x max, 4.8x coverage, nothing due before May 2028) lowered funding risk. Quarterly GAAP operating cash flow of +$4.6M, −$179M, −$160M and −$105M shows the gap is persistent, not a one-off.
    • The Q2 30% customer is not FTAI's own fund. Our arithmetic puts the fund at ≈ 20% in Q2. An unnamed third party bought ≈ $286M, about three times its Q1 level.
    • Corrections and additions:
      • Short interest is falling (7.0M → 5.7M shares, FINRA), not "rebuilding".
      • SEC comment letters (2024-11/2025-01) on cash-flow and inventory accounting surfaced in the court record.
      • The EY → KPMG auditor switch came five months after the short report.

Open questions & data gaps

  • J&F terms. FTAI's stake, capital commitment, who bears the 10% performance haircut, and Power inventory are not in any FTAI filing. This is the biggest gap: it decides Bull #5, Bear #2 and the top tailwind and headwind.
  • Identity of the 30% Q2 customer. Not found. The fund being the 20% customer is our arithmetic, not a company statement.
  • Adjusted FCF definition. It is not in the 10-K or 10-Q, and the IR presentation is blocked. Our reconstruction comes within ~$9M of the reported H1 figure.
  • Buyback execution, fund warehouse and the 2026 fund close. No 8-Ks were filed. These are only visible in the Q3 10-Q.
  • Shannahan docket after 2026-06-10. The CourtListener record may lag the real docket.
  • Consensus. FY2028 consensus and sell-side Power assumptions were not found. Mean targets conflict ($317 MarketBeat vs $356 S&P data). Q3 consensus EPS conflicts ($1.37 vs $1.82, Benzinga pages).
  • Primary transcripts. All FTAI call quotes come from third-party transcript pages (Investing.com, Equibles, Allmind), not company audio.
  • EO 14421 scope for off-grid units, and whether Jereh's US factory assembles the Mod-1 package. This should be clearer after DOE's rules.
  • Laguna 2026 appearance. The 2026-09-16 Morgan Stanley Laguna transcript cited in dive #2 was not re-verified this run.
Sources
  1. FTAI Aviation Form 10-K FY2025 — SEC EDGAR — 2026-02-27 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026012940/ftai-20251231.htm
  2. FTAI Form 10-Q Q1 2026 — SEC EDGAR — 2026-05-01 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026029335/ftai-20260331.htm
  3. FTAI Form 10-Q Q2 2026 — SEC EDGAR — 2026-07-31 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026051412/ftai-20260630.htm
  4. FTAI Form 10-Q Q3 2025 — SEC EDGAR — 2025-10-29 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000159036425000041/ftai-20250930.htm
  5. FTAI Q2 2026 earnings release (8-K Ex. 99.1) — SEC EDGAR — 2026-07-29 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026050622/ftai6302026earningsrelease.htm
  6. FTAI Q1 2026 earnings release — SEC EDGAR — 2026-04-29 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026028390/ftai3312026earningsrelease.htm
  7. FTAI Q4 2025 earnings release — SEC EDGAR — 2026-02-25 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000162828026011685/ftai123125earningsrelease.htm
  8. Form 8-K Item 4.01, change of auditor (EY → KPMG) — SEC EDGAR — 2025-06-24 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036125023499/ef20050905_8k.htm
  9. Form 8-K, Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ($2.025B revolver) — SEC EDGAR — 2026-04-30 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036126017931/ef20071938_8k.htm
  10. Form S-3ASR automatic shelf — SEC EDGAR — 2026-05-01 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036126018591/ny20072118x1_s3asr.htm
  11. Form 8-K Item 5.07, AGM results — SEC EDGAR — 2026-05-29 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036126023226/ef20075112_8k.htm
  12. Form 8-K Item 5.02, CFO transition — SEC EDGAR — 2026-03-06 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036126008165/ef20067294_8k.htm
  13. Form 8-K Item 5.02, Strategic Capital Profit Participation Plan — SEC EDGAR — 2026-01-28 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000114036126002691/ef20064098_8k.htm
  14. EDGAR submissions feed and XBRL company facts, CIK 1590364 — SEC — retrieved 2026-10-12 — https://data.sec.gov/submissions/CIK0001590364.json
  15. Form 4, M. Tuchman (sales 2026-05-01/04) — SEC EDGAR — 2026-05-05 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000159036426000046/0001590364-26-000046.txt
  16. Form 4, D. Moreno (purchase 2026-07-31) — SEC EDGAR — 2026-08-03 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1590364/000159036426000078/0001590364-26-000078.txt
  17. Earnings call transcript: FTAI Aviation Q2 2026 (third-party) — Investing.com — 2026-07-30 — https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-ftai-aviation-q2-2026-eps-miss-clouds-strong-revenue-growth-93CH-4824650
  18. FTAI Q2 2026 call transcript (third-party, contains transcription errors) — Equibles — 2026-07-30 — https://equibles.com/stocks/ftai/calls/2026-q2
  19. FTAI Q4 2025 earnings call (transcript) — Allmind — 2026-02-26 — https://allmind.ai/earnings/event/bt_FTAI_2025_Q4
  20. FTAI Q1 2026 earnings call (transcript) — Allmind — 2026-04-30 — https://allmind.ai/earnings/event/bt_FTAI_2026_Q1
  21. FTAI Q3 2025 earnings call (transcript) — Allmind — 2025-10-28 — https://allmind.ai/earnings/event/bt_FTAI_2025_Q3
  22. FTAI Announces $1.465 Billion Gas Turbine Generator Set Order Through J&F Power Systems — GlobeNewswire via Stock Titan — 2026-07-22 — https://www.stocktitan.net/news/FTAI/ftai-announces-1-465-billion-gas-turbine-generator-set-order-through-9hxmtghfcyrq.html
  23. Jereh announcement on J&F contract (Chinese) — Cailian (cls.cn) — 2026-07-24 — https://www.cls.cn/detail/2436653
  24. Jereh investor-relations record summary (Chinese) — Cailian (cls.cn) — 2026-09-05 — https://www.cls.cn/detail/2474994
  25. China's Jereh gains by limit on USD1.5 billion turbine generator order — Yicai Global — 2026-07-23 — https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/chinas-jereh-jumps-by-limit-on-usd15-billion-gas-turbine-generator-order-from-cloud-service-provider
  26. FTAI Aviation Expands United Airlines Engine Exchange Agreement to Include CFM56-7B Engines — GlobeNewswire via Finviz — 2026-10-08 — https://finviz.com/news/400352/ftai-aviation-expands-united-airlines-engine-exchange-agreement-to-include-cfm56-7b-engines
  27. FTAI Announces Timing of Third Quarter 2026 Earnings and Conference Call (and 2026-12-10 Investor Meeting) — GlobeNewswire via Finviz — 2026-10-06 — https://finviz.com/news/399013/ftai-aviation-ltd-announces-timing-of-third-quarter-2026-earnings-and-conference-call
  28. FTAI Aviation Announces $500 Million Share Repurchase Program — GlobeNewswire via FinancialContent — 2026-09-15 — https://www.financialcontent.com/article/gnwcq-2026-9-15-ftai-aviation-announces-500-million-share-repurchase-program
  29. Moody's upgrades FTAI Aviation to Ba1 — Yahoo Finance — 2026-05-19 — https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/moody-upgraded-ftai-aviation-ltd-122846935.html
  30. Shannahan v. FTAI Aviation Ltd., 1:25-cv-00541 (S.D.N.Y.) docket — CourtListener — latest entry 2026-06-10, read 2026-10-12 — https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69558488/shannahan-v-ftai-aviation-ltd/
  31. Shannahan v. FTAI Aviation Ltd. case page — Labaton Keller Sucharow — undated — https://www.labaton.com/Cases/Shannahan-v-FTAI-Aviation-Ltd
  32. Executive Order 14421, Securing the United States Bulk-Power System — Federal Register (doc 2026-17843) — 2026-08-31 — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-08-31/pdf/2026-17843.pdf
  33. DOE Request for Information, Securing the US Bulk-Power System, 91 FR 57322 — Federal Register — 2026-09-09 — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-09-09/pdf/2026-18370.pdf
  34. DOE Bulk-Power RFI webinar takeaways — Davis Wright Tremaine — 2026-09 — https://www.dwt.com/blogs/energy--environmental-law-blog/2026/09/doe-bulk-power-rfi-guidance
  35. Notice of designation of Chinese military companies (Section 1260H) — Federal Register / DoD — 2026-06-10 — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-10/pdf/2026-11571.pdf
  36. Federal Register keyword search "Jereh" — federalregister.gov — queried 2026-10-12 — https://www.federalregister.gov/api/v1/documents.json?conditions[term]=Jereh
  37. OFAC recent actions: settlement with Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services Group — US Treasury OFAC — 2018-12-12 — https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20181212
  38. GE Aerospace Q2 2026 earnings call transcript — GE Aerospace — 2026-07-16 — https://www.geaerospace.com/sites/default/files/geaerospace_webcast_transcript_07162026.pdf
  39. Recent events: your questions answered — GE Aerospace IR — 2026-05-06 — https://www.geaerospace.com/news/investor-relations/ir-updates/recent-events-your-questions-answered
  40. CFM56 overhaul demand remains strong, GE Aerospace says — Aviation Week — 2026-09-22 — https://aviationweek.com/mro/aircraft-propulsion/cfm56-overhaul-demand-remains-strong-ge-aerospace-says
  41. StandardAero Q2 2026 earnings call transcript — Motley Fool — 2026-08-13 — https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/08/13/standardaero-saro-q2-2026-earnings-call-transcript/
  42. Willis Lease launches in-house engine module restoration capability (Willis Module Shop) — Barchart — 2026-02 — https://www.barchart.com/story/news/182354/willis-lease-finance-corporation-launches-in-house-engine-module-restoration-capability-willis-module-shop
  43. Engine shortages and MRO backlog keep values and lease rates elevated, says IBA (summary of IBA data) — aerospace-innovations.com — 2026 (exact date not found) — https://aerospace-innovations.com/engine-shortages-and-mro-backlog-keep-values-and-lease-rates-elevated-says-iba/
  44. GE Vernova Q2 2026 results (8-K) — SEC EDGAR — 2026-07-22 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001996810/000199681026000147/gevpressrelease2q26.htm
  45. Aeroderivative turbines move to the center of AI data center power strategy — Data Center Frontier — 2026 (exact date not found) — https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/energy/article/55358731/aeroderivative-turbines-move-to-the-center-of-ai-data-center-power-strategy
  46. Data center developers and distributed behind-the-meter power (aeroderivative lead times, S&P data) — Seeking Alpha — 2026 (exact date not found) — https://seekingalpha.com/article/4833399-data-center-developers-distributed-behind-meter-power
  47. Middle East disruptions, high fuel prices halve airline industry profitability — IATA — 2026-06-07 — https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/06-07-middle-east-disruptions-high-fuel-prices-halve-airline-industry-profitability/
  48. Air passenger demand slips in August — IATA — 2026-09-30 — https://iata.org/en/pressroom/2026-releases/09-30-air-passenger-demand-slips-august/
  49. Jet fuel price monitor, week to 2026-09-18 (secondary, unverified) — Forbes Japan — 2026-09-22 — https://forbesjapan.com/articles/detail/105219
  50. IBA: collapse in air travel driving down engine values and MRO demand — AviationPros — 2020 — https://www.aviationpros.com/airports/consultants/press-release/21158072/iba-collapse-in-air-travel-driving-down-engine-values-and-mro-demand-says-iba
  51. AerSale Form 10-K FY2020 — SEC EDGAR — 2021-03 — https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1754170/000110465921037098/tm211117d1_10k.htm
  52. MTU Aero Engines presents figures for 2020 — MTU — 2021-02-18 — https://mtu.de/newsroom/press/press-archive/press-archive-detail/mtu-aero-engines-ag-presents-figures-for-2020
  53. Section 301 replaced the global tariff: how the new system works — TradLinx — 2026-07 — https://blogs.tradlinx.com/section-301-replaced-the-global-tariff-here-is-how-the-new-system-works/
  54. President Trump announces negotiations based on Section 232 commercial aircraft and engine findings — Thompson Hine — 2026-07-12 — https://www.thompsonhinesmartrade.com/2026/07/president-trump-announces-negotiations-based-on-section-232-commercial-aircraft-and-engine-findings/
  55. EPA turbine rules and air permitting for data centers — Clark Hill — 2026 — https://clarkhill.com/news-events/news/epa-turbine-rules-air-permitting-data-centers/
  56. FTAI price targets and ratings — MarketBeat — retrieved 2026-10-11 — https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/FTAI/price-target/
  57. FTAI forecast (consensus revenue/EPS, targets) — Stockanalysis (S&P Global data) — 2026-09-29 — https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/ftai/forecast/
  58. FTAI short interest (FINRA data) — Curvedtrading — 2026-09-30 settlement — https://curvedtrading.com/stocks/ftai/short-interest/
  59. FTAI update — Kairos Research (Substack) — 2026-08-01 — https://kairosresearch.substack.com/p/ftai-update
  60. FTAI: a complex ecosystem — Aerospace Stocks (Substack) — 2026-10-06 — https://aerospacestocks.substack.com/p/ftai-a-complex-ecosystem
  61. FTAI earnings forecasts — Benzinga — 2026-09 — https://kr.benzinga.com/quote/FTAI/earnings-forecasts
  62. FTAI Q2 2026 earnings call highlights (summary) — GuruFocus — 2026-07-30 — https://www.gurufocus.com/news/8991870/ftai-aviation-ltd-ftai-q2-2026-earnings-call-highlights-record-module-production-and-power-business-breakthrough-drive-growth-amid-strategic-shifts
  63. FTAI Aviation: financial engineering and accounting manipulation in the MRO business — Muddy Waters Research — 2025-01-15 — https://muddywatersresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/MW_01152025.pdf
  64. FTAI could be violating U.S. sanctions against Iran — Muddy Waters Research — 2025-03-03 — https://muddywatersresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/MW_03032025.pdf
  65. FTAI Aviation heads into earnings with shorts rebuilding — Ortex — 2026-10-08 — https://ortex.news/articles/183521/ftai-aviation-heads-into-earnings-with-shorts-rebuilding-and-bulls-far-from-consensus
  66. Jereh Group (002353) 2026 half-year report — Shenzhen Stock Exchange — 2026-08-14 — https://disc.static.szse.cn/disc/disk03/finalpage/2026-08-14/d5e158ce-4407-409e-bf14-8a0386032052.PDF
  67. Five takeaways from Pratt's Farnborough comeback bid (GTF groundings) — Airways Magazine — 2026-07 — https://airwaysmag.com/new-post/five-takeaways-from-pratts-farnborough-comeback-bid
  68. OFAC recent actions (Iran-related designations) — US Treasury OFAC — 2026-05-29 — https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20260529
All FTAI Bulls vs Bears reports
Disclaimer. AI-generated research and podcast (Claude by Anthropic, voices by Google Gemini) for educational purposes — not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell. Willem (MR.INVEST) owns this stock. Check the company’s own filings before making any decision.
← All Bulls vs Bears reports